The Ugly Truth: Adoptions cost real money. So what is the cost of Adoption?
It is the truth, adoptions cost money. And no, it isn't the same as buying a baby. Well, if you are that unethical, indeed there are people and countries who will sell you a baby, but the thought of that is so disgusting to the majority of adoptive parents that I won't even dignify it with a comment.
Most USA adoption agencies, be they international or domestic are non-profit organizations. Some are more non-profit than others. By this I mean there is a span of what the directors and employees earn. I mean 60k to 190k or more. Because of their tax and legal status this is all available publicly, so while this probably won't be the biggest influencing factor in your agency decision, it is nice to know what your adoption dollars are supporting.
So why do adoptions cost money? Ahh, there are a lot of reasons. First the practical. There are administrative costs for your agency, who indeed has to pay people to show up every day, answer the phone, know the business. Adoption without an agency is likely to end you up in a very unscrupulous situation unless you've paid the right FOR PROFIT people (aka lawyers) to get it done ethically.
Second you've got the administrative costs on the other end. Internationally this means everything from court and legal fees, medical fees, orphanage donations, and hiring of staffing in the foreign country. Domestically this can mean anything and everything including hospital and prenatal care for the birth mother. And for both you've got the fees and add-ons that make our own country turn, fbi report here, immigration expense there, etc.
Third, internationally, equalling nearly half of the adoption expense in countries with long stays, travel and housing in country costs a bundle. Think about staying 6 weeks in a hotel... just the cost of that is thousands of dollars. Many places with international adoption needs are the kind of places where middle of the road housing doesn't exist. You've either got tourist hotel or hovel. Others, like Moscow, are expensive expensive cities. Imagine staying in a simple Holiday Inn in NYC for 6 weeks, and you've probably got the expense just about right. The flight costs are also hefty because a)you often have very little notice so discount rates are bye bye as are frequent flyer miles. And, often, your child-to-be doesn't live in an international gateway. Another flight (or two!!!) are required to get there. And for those countries requiring 2 trips, this is going to happen to you twice!
Fourth, you've got grease the wheels money. I wish I could say this didn't exist, but anyone who thinks it doesn't is majorly in denial. Countries that are poor are often also corrupt. At least to some extent.... they go hand in hand. That is one of the reasons they are poor. Whenever there is a large dichotomy between the classes you will find 'inflated prices' for services. Americans, Britons, the French, Italians and Canadians most likely aren't going to pass as Russian, Bulgarian, Kazakh, Vietnamese etc. It is a Catch 22, as paying it breeds more grease money, but not paying breeds fewer children who make it out of institutional hell. And it would be nice to say that refusing this behavior will end it, but in my experience, be it beggars in Cairo, rental apartments in Buenos Aires, or the local rate in Girona, Spain, when there is the reality or perception of wealth differential this "added tax" is a fact of life.
I choose to look at #4 this way anyhow. I have travelled the world over and have also chose not to get roaring angry when the cab driver in Bolivia charges me 4x the amount as a local because it is what it is, and they wouldn't be doing it if a)they didn't really need to, and b)they couldn't unilaterally get away with it. And sometimes, when I stop to think about it I realize 60 boliviano's really is only $2.50 and my outrage base on principle makes me one first world idiot. It is worth the extra $1.50 to get a peaceful cab ride. At least its for a service performed that I asked for.
Personally, the part of the equation that is most unsettling to me is the orphanage donation part. What!!!!? you say!!!! Before your indignation makes you click off to the comments section with a nasty-gram, let me explain. Yes, I too want to save the children. All of them, everywhere. I have actually had first hand contact with needy children in my travels. Its ridiculously heart-wrenching. BUT... yes, here's the but, the orphanage donation part of the equation is the part that tends to go the corruptest the fastest. Yes it is true, $2000 dollars might be a good sum to you, but to an orphanage where children live on $1.45 a day, this is an enormous sum. Now multiply that by the 30-100 adoptions that happen every year at that orphanage and you can see what I'm saying. Just who, exactly, is benefitting most from this 'donation'?
Money like that leads quickly to a)orphanages seeking children to adopt out, b)orphanages giving favors to adoption agencies or programs 'donating' the most, and c)some very well off orphanage directors and employees. Now this isn't every case. But systematic 'required' or even 'suggested' donations aren't the same as real donations and we all know it. And in many cases the money once donated isn't in the donatees hands as to how it is used. Heck, we generally don't even understand the language.
Anyhow, I will step off my soapbox now, as I don't know how to change this, particularly as many countries support this method of adoptive practice. If it makes you feel better (it does me), it isn't just for adoption. As an example, the Russian government treats even basic tourists to their form of governmentally approved extortion. Not only do you need to pay a visa, but you also have to get someone who 'knows' you to sponsor you in country. Now how many of you know someone in Russia? Exactly. So, basically there are people who will sponsor you for the minor fee of $100 dollars. And this is just for the privilege of stepping foot in their country, you can imagine how the average business in Russia works. And Russia is not alone, lets just say that.
I guess the bottom line is to what extent for YOU makes sense as far as weighing the prices to be paid. What is the boundary for you where it becomes morally, ethically or principally too much and it is better off for all children of the sending country if you do not adopt the one child. And there is a level, as bad as it sounds. Yes, the one child will most definitely be better served to be adopted, but at what cost to future children. Its a VERY tough call. The children in todays orphanages are not going to benefit from orphanage reform 15 years from now - so what do we do til then? Sacrifice them for the greater good?
Hard hard.
Posts
